home observing guide objects data
observing abell planetaries
George Abell published his catalog of Planetary Nebula in preliminary form in 1955 and in final form in 1966. The catalog contains "old" Planetary Nebula, of which half were discovered by Albert George Wilson and the other half by Robert G. Harrington, Rudolph Minkowski, and George Abell on the plates of the first Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS I). Download the Abell PN Observing Guide (pdf file 23 MByte, last update 2008) The Observing Atlas comprises George Abell's complete catalog (except for the two known plate faults). Each PN is presented with two finder charts with fields of view of 25° and 5° to locate the field. A 30' x 30' DSS print allows to locate the planetary and to get an estimate of its apparent size.
Additionally, there are two close-ups of each planetary from the POSS II blue and red plates, which might be helpful to judge the visibility of the PN in the visible range. The relative spectral sensitivity of our eye compares roughly to that of the POSS II blue plates, which are most sensitive in the range from 450 to 550 nm, while the red plates are sensitive in the range from 620 to 700 nm (the emulsions used for the POSS I survey, on the other hand, had a quite different spectral sensitivity ranging from 350 to 500 nm and from 620 to 670 nm, respectively). The comparison between POSS blue and red plates may give you a hint to the degree of excitation of the gas shells of the planetaries. The OIII lines of doubly ionized oxygen are at 501nm and 496nm (with only about a third of the intensity of the 501nm line), while the HII lines of ionized hydrogen are at 656nm for H-alpha and 486nm for H-beta (which carries again only one third of the intensity of the H-alpha line). If a PN is visible primarily on the blue plates, it will likely be an object for the OIII filter. If it is much brighter on the red plates, this may be due to its emission in H-alpha and therefore indicate a considerable line strength in HII. As this implies as well emission in H-beta, a UHC filter that does include the H-beta line as well, might be the filter of choice. Note that some PN have their strongest emission in NII (655nm and 658nm). In those cases, a "bright" appearance on the red plates does not necessarily imply strong HII emission (in that case H-alpha at 656nm)! As most astro-imaging H-alpha filters (with the exemption of the very narrow 3nm filters) transmit not only H-alpha, but as well both NII lines, even most "H-alpha" images do not distinguish between HII and NII. For these planetaries, the OIII filter may be the filter of choice, even that the planetary appears deeply red on images. For further information see also here.
References Abell GO (1955) Publ Astron Soc Pac 67: 258-261 Abell GO (1966) Astrophys J 144: 259-279
Links to Abell PN web pages Steve Gottlieb and Jim Shields
|
|
The following observations were done starting about 2006 mostly with my 22" Dob under 6m0 to 6m5 skies.
Abell 1 in Cepheus 00 12 54.6 +69 10 23 Even under excellent conditions no successful observation No |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 2 in Cassiopeia 00 45 34.8 +57 57 35
At 200x, the PN appears with OIII filter as a conspicuous object and shows a small round disk. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 3 in Cassiopeia 02 12 06.6 +64 09 03
Abell 3 is a difficult object. At 350x, the PN was suspected at times with OIII filter. Doubtful observation.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 4 in Perseus 02 45 23.8 +42 33 03
Visible without filter at 250x. At 350x with OIII filter, the PN is easy and appears as a small disk with direct vision. Responds also well to UHC. Nearby galaxy was not observed. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 5 in Perseus 02 52 14.8 +50 35 54
Red emission is mostly NII, which is 4x stronger than HII (Frew 2013). Not visible with either OIII, H beta, or UHC. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 6 in Cassiopeia 02 58 42.0 +64 30 07
At 100x with OIII filter, the SE edge was visible at times, becomes more diffuse towards NW. Nearby star is disturbing.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 7 in Lepus 05 03 07.5 -15 36 23
Appears as an extremely faint, large and diffuse patch N of a prominent asterism. OIII filter. Nearby galaxy is not visible. |
DSS 30'x30' |
Abell 8 in Auriga 05 06 38.4 +39 08 09
At 200x with OIII filter, the PN is an easy object and appears as small disk superimposed to two small stars. OIII > UHC. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 9 in Auriga 05 28 56.7 +36 03 05
Abell 9 is just at the northern edge of the OC M38 in Auriga.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 10 in Orion 05 31 45.8 +06 55 57
At 250x and with OIII filter, the PN is visible as a small and relatively bright disk. Easy object. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 11 in Orion 05 37 22.1 +08 15 37
This is very likely a misclassification and rather a reflection nebula, as it shows no emission lines. Nothing visible at 350x. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 12 in Orion 06 02 20.0 +09 39 15
With OIII filter at 500x, it takes some time until the PN can be discerned for the first time. After that, it is a relatively easy object and appears as a small disk in the glare of µ Ori.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 13 in Orion 06 04 47.8 +03 56 36
Despite that the red color is intriguing, this PN is strongest in NII and not in HII. According to Frew 2013 the ratio is 3.5. For visual observers, it is therefore not necessarily an H-beta object. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 14 in Orion 06 11 08.7 +11 46 45
Red emission is mostly NII, which is 6x stronger than HII (Frew 2013).
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 15 in Canis Major 06 27 02.0 -25 22 50
This is a very low object and nothing is visible, despite relatively good transparency. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 16 in Lynx 06 43 54.9 +61 47 25
Nothing visible. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 17 in Monoceros 06 48 38.1 -09 32 43 This is likely a plate fault on a POSS I red plate. Nothing is visible on the corresponding POSS I blue plate, which was exposed 60 minutes earlier or on plates of later surveys. Surprisingly, you may find positive observing reports ...
|
|
Abell 18 in Monoceros 06 56 14.5 -02 53 09
Red emission is mostly NII, which is 2.5x stronger than HII (Frew 2013). |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 19 in Gemini 06 59 57.0 +14 36 35
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 20 in Canis Minor 07 22 57.6 +01 45 34
With UHC at 200x, the PN appears as a faint round disk with averted vision, quite distinct object with well defined borders. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 21 in Gemini 07 29 04.5 +13 14 55
The most beautiful ear of the universe! Visible already w/o filter. Responds very well to OIII filter. E side forms filamentous crescent, which is relatively bright in OIII. Inside filled with weaker OIII emission. NW counterpart also visible as an extremely faint crescent along chain of stars, forms with E crescent a closed structure. |
DSS 18'x18' |
Abell 22 in Canis Minor 07 36 08.2 +02 42 24
Suspected as an extremely faint glow around star.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 23 in Puppis 07 43 18.0 -34 45 12
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 24 in Canis Minor 07 51 39.3 +03 00 29
This is again one of these funny red nebula that should respond well to H beta, but don't. According to Madsen et al., the red color is not due to to HII, but NII, which is about 5 times stronger than H-alpha and 7 times stronger than OIII. This makes OIII the strongest visual line, even that it doesn't look like this. Nevertheless, even with OIII filter, the PN appears extremely faint, round and featureless.
|
DSS 18'x18' |
Abell 25 in Monoceros 08 06 46.0 -02 52 42
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 26 in Puppis 08 09 01.6 -32 40 25
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 27 in Pyxis 08 31 52.5 -32 06 10
Red emission is mostly NII, which is 4.6 x stronger than HII (Frew 2013). |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 28 in Ursa Major 08 41 35.5 +58 13 49
According to Madsen et al., this should be an object for the H-beta filter.
|
DSS 18'x18' |
Abell 29 in Pyxis 08 40 17.0 -20 54 14
According to Tweedy and Kwitter, NII is stronger than HII with this PN, with some OIII being detectable. According to Frew 2013, NII is 6x stronger than HII. |
DSS 18'x18' |
Abell 30 in Cancer 08 46 53.6 +17 52 44
With OIII filter at 200x, the PN appears as a diffuse glow around central star, not well defined. OIII > UHC.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 31 in Cancer 08 54 13.2 +08 53 59
This is the largest Abell PN with a size of 17'x16' (of which, however, only the central part is visible) ! With OIII filter at 100x, Abell 31 is a relatively easy object and appears diffuse with no distinct boundaries. Internal structure is suspected but difficult to pin down. |
DSS 30'x30' |
Abell 32 in Hydra 09 16 21.6 +03 53 04
This is likely a plate fault on a POSS I red plate. Nothing is visible on the corresponding POSS I blue plate, which was exposed 15 minutes earlier or on plates of later surveys.
|
|
Abell 33 in Hydra 09 39 09.1 -02 48 32
With OIII filter at 200x, this is a beautiful and perfect PN with distinct disk next to star. Darker center suspected. Well defined NW edge, lesser defined towards SE, appears therefore a bit oval. A bit less distinct with UHC.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 34 in Hydra 09 45 35.0 -13 10 10
With OIII filter at 100x, the PN is visible only at times as a round and extremely faint glow with relatively well defined borders.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 35 in Hydra 12 53 41.4 -22 51 42
This is the second largest entry in the Abell catalog with 16'x11', of which again only the central part is visible. Abell 35 is possibly a Strömgren sphere and not a true PN (Frew, thesis). With OIII Filter, this object is immediately there as a diffuse patch around a group of three stars. The band structure in the S part was suspected. Distance of this object is about 500 LYs. |
DSS 30'x30' |
Abell 36 in Virgo 13 40 41.3 -19 52 57
Another large and bright Abell PN with a diameter of roughly 8'.. With OIII filter at 100x, this PN (distance 800 LYs) is quite distinctly visible around its central star. It appears slightly annular with darker center. |
DSS 18'x18' |
Abell 37 in Virgo 14 04 25.9 -17 13 40
With OIII filter at 250x, Abell 37 appears as a distinct small round disk. Also catalogued as IC 972. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 38 in Scorpio 16 23 18.7 -31 44 58
Red emission is mostly NII, which is 11x (!) stronger than HII (Frew 2013).
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 39 in Hercules 16 27 33.8 +27 54 33
Another one of the perfectly round Abell PNs! Appears with OIII filter as an easily visible and distinct round disk. At times, the center appeared darker. OIII > UHC.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 40 in Ophiuchus 16 48 34.5 -21 00 51
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 41 in Serpens 17 29 02.2 -15 13 07
Appears at 300x as a very faint little disk. Best with UHC, less pronounced with OIII. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 42 in Ophiuchus 17 31 29.2 -08 19 09
At 300x, both with UHC and OIII suspected as an extremely faint glow with averted vision only. Uncertain observation, as the neighboring stars are interfering. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 43 in Ophiuchus 17 53 32.2 +10 37 25
With OIII filter at 200x, Abell 43 is an easy object and appears as a filled disk with superimposed stars. Not anular. Can also be discerned without filter. There are hints to internal structure, which is, however, difficult to verify due to the superimposed small stars. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 44 in Sagittarius 18 30 11.3 -16 45 24
Near open cluster NGC 6645, this is a small PN next to a group of stars, which are visible even with OIII filter and hamper somewhat a clear resolution of the PN. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 45 in Scutum 18 30 16.1 -11 36 56
Not yet observed. Structure appears to be mainly NII with only little contrast to the surroundings in HII (Tweedy and Kwitter and Frew 2013). |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 46 in Lyra 18 31 18.6 +26 56 11
With OIII filter at 100x, the PN is immediately visible. Somewhat more difficult at 200x, UHC filter about equally good as OIII filter. With UHC, central star is visible, while with OIII filter, the PN is a better defined round and uniform disk. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 47 in Serpens 18 35 22.6 +00 13 50
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 48 in Aquila 18 42 46.9 -03 13 17 Unsuccessful observation.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 49 in Scutum 18 53 28.6 -06 28 35
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 50 in Draco 18 59 19.9 +48 27 53
Abell 50 is also catalogued as NGC 6742. Abell 50 appears as a small disk that is relatively bright. Visible even without filter.
NOAO |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 51 in Sagittarius 19 01 01.4 -18 12 14
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 52 in Aquila 19 04 32.4 +17 57 08
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 53 in Aquila 19 06 46.1 +06 23 50
Red emission is to a large extent NII and about 1.4x stronger than HII (Frew 2013). With OIII filter at 200x, the PN was visible only at times as a small smudge, not anular. Difficult. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 54 in Vulpecula 19 08 39.6 +22 58 59
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 55 in Aquila 19 10 25.8 -02 20 25
At 200x faintly visible even without filter, the PN becomes distinct with OIII filter. Small round blob without further structure. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 56 in Aquila 19 13 06.6 +02 52 49 Even under excellent conditions no reliable observation
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 57 in Vulpecula 19 17 05.9 +25 37 33
With OIII filter at 200x, the PN is quite distinct. Appears as a small blob next to star. A chain of three stars is nearby. OIII > UHC.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 58 in Aquila 19 18 20.8 +01 46 53
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 59 in Sagitta 19 18 40.1 +19 34 26
Red emission is mostly NII, which is twice as strong as HII (Frew 2013). Even under excellent conditions only suspected |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 60 in Sagittarius 19 19 17.8 -12 14 42
Even under excellent conditions no reliable observation |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 61 in Cygnus 19 19 10.3 +46 14 51
With OIII filter at 200x, Abell 61 can be held steadily with averted vision. Appears as a diffuse round glow, of which the W edge is somewhat better defined.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 62 in Aquila 19 33 18.3 +10 37 04 immediately visible with OIII filter as a very faint round disk with superimposed stars, less pronounced with UHC
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 63 in Sagitta 19 42 10.4 +17 05 11
With OIII filter at 200x, this is a relatively easy PN. Appears as a subtle round and uniform glow, no structure. OIII > UHC. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 64 in Aquila 19 45 35.1 -05 34 02
As a misclassification, Abell 64 is not a PN but the galaxy LEDA 63630. Steadily visible at 350x (w/o filter, of course). |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 65 in Sagittarius 19 46 34.3 -23 08 14
At 200x and with OIII filter, Abell 65 is an obvious elongated patch of light. Response to OIII is better than to UHC, the PN is faintly visible even w/o filter. Nice asterism nearby.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 66 in Sagittarius 19 57 31.8 -21 36 37 At 125x and with OIII filter suspected only as a large round glow.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 67 in Aquila 19 58 27.0 +03 03 00
With OIII filter at 200x, Abell 67 is visible as a small diffuse blob. Can be held steadily with averted vision, not too difficult. Hardly visible with UHC. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 68 in Vulpecula 20 00 10.5 +21 42 54
UHC filter better than OIII, 350x: small and round, difficult object, can be held with averted vision about 50% of the time. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 69 in Cygnus 20 19 58.4 +38 23 59
Red emission is mostly NII, which is 5x stronger than HII (Frew 2013). |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 70 in Aquila 20 31 33.2 -07 05 18
With UHC at 350x, the PN is faint, but distinct, round, anularity not visible. Galaxy is visible at the edge of the PN only without filter.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 71 in Cygnus 20 32 23.4 +47 20 55
Abell 71 was observed as a very faint round glow next to two stars. There is some, but no compelling evidence that Abell 71 is possibly an HII Strömgren sphere rather than a true PN (Pismis et al.).
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 72 in Delphinus 20 50 02.1 +13 33 29
With OIII filter, Abell 72 is a relatively obvious object and appears at 200x as a large diffuse glow. At 350x, the interior is distinctly structured.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 73 in Cepheus 20 56 26.7 +57 26 00
Difficult, only suspected with OIII or UHC. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 74 in Vulpecula 21 16 52.3 +24 08 52
With 7mm exit pupil and UHC, the PN was visible during two observations as a large and extremely faint glow. Some parts of the edge were well defined. |
DSS 30'x30' |
Abell 75 in Cepheus 21 26 23.5 +62 53 33
Abell 75 is also catalogued as NGC 7076. At 250x visible faintly without filter. UHC better than OIII, with filter well visible as a round blob, with some anularity, irregular at one side.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 76 in Aquarius 21 30 03.5 -02 47 06
Abell 76 is the misclassified galaxy PGC 85185. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 77 in Cepheus 21 32 10.3 +55 52 42
Abell 77 is possibly not a PN, but ionized ISM (Frew, thesis). With UHC at 200x, Abell 77 is relatively easy. Appears as a faint and small smudge, slightly oval. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 78 in Cygnus 21 35 29.5 +31 41 44
At 200x, central star immediately visible. With OIII filter, PN becomes visible as a round disk extending about halfways to the two neighboring stars. No internal structure could be discerned.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 79 in Cygnus 22 26 17.3 +54 49 40
Red emission is mostly NII, which is 7x stronger than HII (Frew 2013). Immediately visible with OIII filter at 250x as an elongated glow, no ring structure. Quite faint, but can be held steadily even with direct vision. Visible as well with UHC.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 80 in Lacerta 22 34 45.5 +52 26 12
At 200x, the PN was at best suspected only with OIII filter as a round disk at the correct position. Not better with UHC.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 81 in Cepheus 22 42 25.3 +80 26 28
Abell 81 is also catalogued as IC 1454. Best at 200x, this PN is visible even without filter as a small perfectly round ring with darker center. Enhanced by both UHC and OIII. Superimposed stars.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 82 in Cassiopeia 23 45 47.5 +57 03 56
Best around 150 and 250x with OIII, already with direct vision, less pronounced with UHC. Appears as a round glow placed assymetrically around star and extending about halfway to neighboring star.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 83 in Cassiopeia 23 46 46.9 +54 44 38
Suspected at 200x with averted vision. The two superimposed stars on DSS print are not visible at 200x or 350x. |
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 84 in Cassiopeia 23 47 43.9 +51 23 56
With OIII filter at 200x visible as a diffuse disk next to a star. Quite distinct.
|
DSS 12'x12' |
Abell 85 in Cassiopeia 23 58 53.5 +62 30 28
This is the supernova remnant CTB 1 and not a planetary nebula. No reliable observation up to now even under excellent conditions. HII emission strongest along SW edge, while OIII images reveal the NE edge to be the most prominent (see image by Mischa Schirmer).
|
DSS 60'x60' |
Abell 86 in Cepheus 00 01 30.9 +70 42 30
|
DSS 12'x12' |
|
const. |
RA |
Dek |
mag |
Ų in " |
other designations |
notes |
1 |
Cep |
00 12 55.0 |
+69 10 21 |
18.7 |
46 |
PK 119+6.1 |
|
2 |
Cas |
00 45 36 |
+57 57.4 |
14.5 |
33 |
PK 122-4.1 |
|
3 |
Cas |
02 12 06.6 |
+64 09 01 |
16 |
60 |
PK 131+2.1, Sh 2-189 |
|
4 |
Per |
02 45 23.7 |
+42 33 05 |
14.8 |
22 |
PK 144-15.1 |
|
5 |
Per |
02 52 15.1 |
+50 35 54 |
|
134 |
PK 141-7.1 |
|
6 |
Cas |
02 58 41.9 |
+64 30 06 |
15 |
188 |
PK 136+4.1 |
|
7 |
Lep |
05 03 08.0 |
-15 36 13 |
15.5 |
871 |
PK 215-30.1 |
|
8 |
Aur |
05 06 38.4 |
+39 08 11 |
17.6 |
62 |
PK 167-0.1 |
|
9 |
Aur |
05 28 56.6 |
+36 03 05 |
17.8 |
40 |
PK 172+0.1 |
|
10 |
Ori |
05 31 45.5 |
+06 56 09 |
14 |
35 |
PK 197-14.1, K 1-7 |
|
11 |
Ori |
05 37 19.4 |
+08 15 45 |
17.1 |
32 |
- |
reflection nebula |
12 |
Ori |
06 02 20.0 |
+09 39 14 |
12.4 |
37 |
PK 198-6.1 |
|
13 |
Ori |
06 04 47.9 |
+03 56 36 |
15.3 |
174 |
PK 204-8.1, YM 28 |
|
14 |
Ori |
06 11 08.7 |
+11 46 43 |
17.5 |
40 |
PK 197-3.1 |
|
15 |
CMa |
06 27 02.0 |
-25 22 50 |
15.8 |
34 |
PK 233-16.1 |
|
16 |
Lyn |
06 43 55.5 |
+61 47 25 |
15.4 |
143 |
PK 153+22.1 |
|
17 |
- |
06 48 38.0 |
-09 32 38.8 |
- |
|
- |
plate fault |
18 |
Mon |
06 56 14.5 |
-02 53 09 |
17 |
71 |
PK 216-0.1 |
|
19 |
Gem |
06 59 56.4 |
+14 36 34 |
16.3 |
80 |
PK 200+8.1 |
|
20 |
CMi |
07 22 57.4 |
+01 45 37 |
14.7 |
65 |
PK 214+7.1 |
|
21 |
Gem |
07 29 02.5 |
+13 15 13 |
10.2 |
744 |
PK 205+14.1, YM 29, Sh 2-274, Medusa Nebula |
|
22 |
CMi |
07 36 07.9 |
+02 42 28 |
15.4 |
105 |
PK 215+11.1, K 1-11 |
|
23 |
Pup |
07 43 18.3 |
-34 45 12 |
13.1 |
54 |
PK 249-5.1 |
|
24 |
CMi |
07 51 37.6 |
+03 00 21 |
13.9 |
265 |
PK 217+14.1 |
|
25 |
Mon |
08 06 46.5 |
-02 52 35 |
15.4 |
150 |
PK 224+15.1, K 1-13 |
|
26 |
Pup |
08 09 01.5 |
-32 40 22 |
18.1 |
40 |
PK 250+0.1 |
|
27 |
Pyx |
08 31 52.5 |
-32 06 09 |
15.6 |
47 |
PK 252+4.1, K 1-1 |
|
28 |
UMa |
08 41 35.6 |
+58 13 48 |
13.5 |
268 |
PK 158+37.1 |
|
29 |
Pyx |
08 40 18.9 |
-20 54 36 |
17 |
482 |
PK 244+12.1, E563-PN009 |
|
30 |
Cnc |
08 46 54.4 |
+17 52 33 |
13 |
127 |
PK 208+33.1 |
|
31 |
Cnc |
08 54 13.1 |
+08 53 59 |
12 |
970 |
PK 219+31.1, Sh 2-290 |
|
32 |
- |
09 16 24.8 |
+03 53 26 |
|
|
|
plate fault |
33 |
Hya |
09 39 09.0 |
-02 48 33 |
12.9 |
275 |
PK 238+34.1 |
|
34 |
Hya |
09 45 35.3 |
-13 10 16 |
12.9 |
281 |
PK 248+29.1 |
|
35 |
Hya |
12 53 32.9 |
-22 52 22 |
13.3 |
938 |
PK 303+40.1, Sh 2-313 |
possibly HII region |
36 |
Vir |
13 40 41.2 |
-19 52 57 |
11.8 |
478 |
PK 318+4.1 |
|
37 |
Vir |
14 04 26.0 |
-17 13 41 |
13.6 |
43 |
PK 326+42.1, IC 972 |
|
38 |
Sco |
16 23 18.5 |
-31 44 58 |
15.5 |
154 |
PK 346+12.1, K 1-3 |
|
39 |
Her |
16 27 33.6 |
+27 54 34 |
12.9 |
170 |
PK 47+42.1 |
|
40 |
Oph |
16 48 34.5 |
-21 00 51 |
17.8 |
30 |
PK 359+15.1 |
|
41 |
Ser |
17 29 02.0 |
-15 12 59 |
15.6 |
16 |
PK 9+10.1 |
|
42 |
Oph |
17 31 29.1 |
-08 19 10 |
16.5 |
60 |
PK 16+13.1 |
|
43 |
Oph |
17 53 32.3 |
+10 37 24 |
14.7 |
80 |
PK 36+17.1 |
|
44 |
Sgr |
18 30 11.4 |
-16 45 28 |
15.8 |
63 |
PK 15-3.1 |
|
45 |
Sct |
18 30 15.4 |
-11 36 56 |
12.8 |
302 |
PK 20-0.1 |
|
46 |
Lyr |
18 31 18.9 |
+26 56 17 |
13.8 |
63 |
PK 55+16.1 |
|
47 |
Ser |
18 35 22.6 |
-00 13 50 |
19.5 |
17 |
PK 30+3.1 |
|
48 |
Aql |
18 42 46.9 |
-03 13 25 |
17.2 |
43 |
PK 29+0.1 |
|
49 |
Sct |
18 53 28.5 |
-06 28 33 |
16.2 |
35 |
PK 27-3.1 |
|
50 |
Dra |
18 59 19.7 |
+48 27 57 |
13.4 |
31 |
PK 78+18.1, NGC 6742 |
|
51 |
Sgr |
19 01 01.1 |
-18 12 15 |
14 |
64 |
PK 17-10.1 |
|
52 |
Aql |
19 04 32.3 |
+17 57 07 |
16.5 |
37 |
PK 50+5.1 |
|
53 |
Aql |
19 06 45.8 |
+06 23 56 |
16.3 |
30 |
PK 40-0.1 |
|
54 |
Vul |
19 08 39.6 |
+22 58 58 |
16.8 |
67 |
PK 55+6.1 |
|
55 |
Aql |
19 10 30.4 |
-02 21 02 |
13.2 |
47 |
PK 33-5.1 |
|
56 |
Aql |
19 13 06.1 |
+02 52 48 |
14.1 |
188 |
PK 37-3.2 |
|
57 |
Vul |
19 17 06 |
+25 37 30 |
14.4 |
40 |
PK 58+6.1 |
|
58 |
Aql |
19 18 20.6 |
+01 47 00 |
17.4 |
44 |
PK 37-5.1 |
|
59 |
Sge |
19 18 40.0 |
+19 34 33 |
16.4 |
94 |
PK 53+3.1 |
|
61 |
Cyg |
19 19 10.1 |
+46 14 36 |
13.5 |
88 |
PK 77+14.1 |
|
60 |
Sgr |
19 19 18.6 |
-12 14 54 |
16.2 |
201 |
PK 25-11.1 |
|
62 |
Aql |
19 33 18.3 |
+10 37 01 |
14.7 |
161 |
PK 47-4.1 |
|
63 |
Sgr |
19 42 10.4 |
+17 05 15 |
16.9 |
40 |
PK 53-3.1 |
|
64 |
Aql |
19 45 34.8 |
+05 33 52 |
15.3 |
40 |
PGC 63630, CGCG 397-005 |
galaxy |
65 |
Sgr |
19 46 33.8 |
-23 08 12 |
13.8 |
134 |
PK 17-21.1 + several galaxy designations |
|
66 |
Sgr |
19 57 31.5 |
-21 36 46 |
14.9 |
295 |
PK 19-23.1 |
|
67 |
Aql |
19 58 27.0 |
+03 02 52 |
13.6 |
69 |
PK 43-13.1 |
|
68 |
Vul |
20 00 10.8 |
+21 42 58 |
15.2 |
40 |
PK 60-4.1 |
|
69 |
Cyg |
20 19 58.3 |
+38 24 02 |
20.2 |
25 |
PK 76+1.1 |
|
70 |
Aql |
20 31 33.2 |
-07 05 17 |
14.7 |
45 |
PK 38-25.1 |
|
71 |
Cyg |
20 32 23.2 |
+47 21 04 |
14.5 |
165 |
PK 85+4.1, Sh 2-116 |
HII region |
72 |
Del |
20 50 02.0 |
+13 33 28 |
12.7 |
134 |
PK 59-18.1 |
|
73 |
Cep |
20 56 27.0 |
+57 26 03 |
17 |
80 |
PK 95+7.1 |
|
74 |
Vul |
21 16 52.3 |
+24 08 51 |
15.8 |
871 |
PK 72-17.1 |
|
75 |
Cep |
21 26 23.6 |
+62 53 33 |
14.5 |
67 |
PK 101+8.1, NGC 7076 |
|
76 |
Aqr |
21 30 03.8 |
-02 48 32 |
15.6 |
|
PK 5-036.1, PGC 85185 |
galaxy |
77 |
Cep |
21 32 10.2 |
+55 52 43 |
14 |
67 |
PK 97+3.1, Sh 2-128, LBN 443 |
HII region |
78 |
Cyg |
21 35 29.4 |
+31 41 45 |
13.4 |
113 |
PK 81-14.1 |
|
79 |
Lac |
22 26 17.3 |
+54 49 38 |
15.3 |
59 |
PK 102-2.1 |
|
80 |
Lac |
22 34 45.6 |
+52 26 06 |
16 |
161 |
PK 102-5.1 |
|
81 |
Cep |
22 42 25.0 |
+80 26 32 |
14.4 |
34 |
PK 117+18.1, IC 1454 |
|
82 |
Cas |
23 45 47.8 |
+57 03 59 |
12.7 |
94 |
PK 114-4.1 |
|
83 |
Cas |
23 46 46.7 |
+54 44 38 |
15.5 |
42 |
PK 113-6.1 |
|
84 |
Cas |
23 47 44.3 |
+51 23 56 |
13 |
147 |
PK 112-10.1 |
|
85 |
Cas |
23 59 12.9 |
+62 26 13 |
|
2000 |
CTB 1, SNR G116.9+00.1 |
SNR |
86 |
Cep |
00 01 31.2 |
+70 42 29 |
16.7 |
70 |
PK 118+8.2 |
|
The Digitized Sky Survey was produced at the Space Telescope Science Institute under U.S. Government grant NAG W-2166. The images of these surveys are based on photographic data obtained using the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on Palomar Mountain and the UK Schmidt Telescope. The plates were processed into the present compressed digital form with the permission of these institutions.